PriComp started as a set of compliance registers and grew into a connected operations platform. Properties, assets, planned maintenance, compliance, jobs, risk, documents and reporting all sit on one data model — so a change in one place is visible everywhere it matters.
A property has assets. Assets need statutory checks and planned maintenance. Checks produce reports. Reports produce remedial actions. Remedial actions become jobs, and the closed job becomes the evidence that the risk was dealt with. PriComp is built around that thread rather than around a filing cabinet — which is why a finding in a report can become an assigned job in a single click, with a permanent link back to where it came from.
What it does. Every statutory obligation held as a compliance item against a property — with its frequency, its last completion, its documents and a status that recalculates itself: compliant, awaiting report, remedials required, not compliant, overdue. Assessments are generated from compliance items automatically, and risk is tied to those assessments rather than kept in a parallel spreadsheet.
Who it's for. The person who currently keeps the master compliance spreadsheet — and the director who has to sign off on what it says without being able to check it.
What it does. A proper asset register — categorised, grouped, editable in bulk — and a full planned preventative maintenance capability on top of it: service types, checklists, scheduling logic and calendars that respect the property filter every user already has set. Because PPM is linked to assets, the service history follows the equipment rather than the person who booked the visit.
Who it's for. Facilities and estates teams who can list their sites but not their plant — and anyone who has had to prove when a specific unit was last serviced.
What it does. A guided job-creation wizard with priorities (P1 one hour through P4 five days), automatic PO numbers, and a link to whatever the job came from — a compliance item, a PPM or an asset. Active and completed work are separated, linked compliance is flagged on the job card, and you can click straight through to the item that triggered it.
Who it's for. Teams where “the engineer said it needs doing” currently lives in an email thread, and nobody can say how many remedials are open across the estate.
What it does. Upload a COSHH safety data sheet and the assessment form fills itself in — product, hazards, PPE, storage, first aid, disposal — ready for someone to check and save. Upload an engineer's report (fire alarm, emergency lighting, TMV, UPS, LOLER and similar) and PriComp captures provider, site, visit details, assets tested, findings, remedial actions, outcome and next-due dates as a structured record against the document. Remedial actions become linked jobs in one click; assets mentioned in the report are checked against the register and can be created from it.
Who it's for. Anyone whose compliance data already exists — written down, correctly, in a PDF nobody has time to transcribe.
Compliance work doesn't happen in four neat boxes. These are the supporting registers, controls and views that make the platform usable by a real team across a real estate.
Assessments generated from compliance items, with the risk register aligned to them and risk actions tracked to closure.
Substance assessments per site — and now per department — with the safety data sheet attached and read automatically.
Compliance and PPM plotted across the year, filtered to the properties each user is responsible for.
Dashboards, job reports and one-click Excel exports — every export scoped by the same access rules as the screens.
An organisation → property → department hierarchy, so a group estate and a single site both make sense in the same system.
Role-based permissions with property-scoped access: people see the sites they're responsible for, and nothing else.
Notes against records with read / unread tracking and unread badges, so context travels with the record.
The contractors behind the work, linked to the maintenance and jobs they carry out.
A staff register separate from system users, with fire-training status and a completion percentage that matches your own matrix.
Nobody should buy compliance software on a demo alone. The first two steps cost nothing and are useful even if you never go further — plenty of estates take the Health Check, fix the obvious gap themselves, and come back a year later.
“The system that gets used is the one that already knows your sites on the day you log in.”
Twelve questions score you across all four module families — and tell you honestly whether the platform is the right answer for the gap you've got.